by Martin Salcedo, Esq. - The Human Equation
on 6/18/2013
In a previous article we discussed the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) position on the use of arrest and conviction records in the employment context. According to the EEOC, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (Title VII) prohibits the use of arrest and conviction records in a manner that discriminates on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, or sex. The EEOC recently reaffirmed its position by filing two lawsuits involving the use of criminal background records.
BMW Manufacturing Co.
The EEOC claims that BMW’s criminal conviction policy, which disproportionately screened out African Americans, is not job related and consistent with business necessity. The lawsuit alleges that BMW’s policy is a blanket exclusion that does not provide for an individualized assessment of the nature and gravity of the crimes, the ages of the convictions, or the nature of the workers’ respective positions. More...
1eef8210-3fb1-421b-b645-d3be2c333329|0|.0
Tags: 2013, Background and Reference Checks, Business Strategy, Discrimination, diversity, Employee Status and Job Descriptions, Employment Liability, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Laws and Regulations, recruiting and offers, Risk Management, EEOC, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Workplace Rights, Workplace Harassment and Discrimination
Categories: 2013, Human Resources, Risk Management
by Martin Salcedo, Esq. - The Human Equation
on 4/30/2013
Those of you following us on Facebook or Twitter know that the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) recently revised the Employment Eligibility Verification Form (Form I-9). Though optional since early March 2013, the revised Form I-9 will become mandatory on May 7, 2013. As of this date, employers must stop using prior versions of the Form I-9 and begin using the version dated 03/08/13. (The version date can be found at the bottom of the form.)
I-9’s are used by employers to verify the identity and employment authorization of every new employee hired in the United States, regardless of citizenship. This process is authorized by the Immigration Reform and Control Act to preclude the unlawful hiring, recruiting or accepting a fee for the referral of aliens who are not authorized to work in the United States. More...
b86da5fb-7aaa-43e2-842c-5d1d0a2c31f6|0|.0
Tags: 2013, Background and Reference Checks, Business Strategy, Contractual and Other Liabilities, Employee Status and Job Descriptions, Employment Liability, government forms, Human Resources, Hiring, Interviewing, Laws and Regulations, personnel forms and handbooks, Risk Management, Workers' Compensation, Form I-9, I-9s, US Citizenship and Immigration Service, USCIS, New I-9
Categories: 2013, Human Resources, Risk Management
by Martin Salcedo, Esq. - The Human Equation
on 4/3/2013 Did you know that individuals can be held personally liable for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)? The FLSA’s broad definition of employer includes “any person acting directly or indirectly in the interests of an employer in relation to an employee.” The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently considered when it is appropriate to hold someone personally liable for wage and hour violations under the FLSA.
In Lamonica v. Safe Hurricane Shutters, Inc., former employees sued their employer to recover unpaid overtime wages under the FLSA. The employees also sued two of the corporate-employer’s directors, arguing that they sufficiently controlled the corporation to justify holding them personally liable under the FLSA. To support their case against the directors, the employees showed that: More...
1c1bb552-d340-4e00-ab2a-f61aa87c7486|0|.0
Tags: 2013, benefits & compensation administration, benefits & compensation administration, Benefits and Compensation, Benefits and Compensation Administration, bonuses & pay increases, Bonuses and Pay Increases, Business Strategy, Employee Status and Job Descriptions, Employment Liability, Fair Labor Standards Act, FLSA, Hiring, Human Resources, Laws and Regulations, Managers, Risk Management, Rules and Conduct, The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), wage & hour, wage & hour, Wage and Hour, Workplace Rights
Categories: 2013, Human Resources, Risk Management
by Martin Salcedo, Esq. - The Human Equation
on 3/12/2013 The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes federal standards for minimum wage and overtime compensation. Under the FLSA, interns in the for-profit private sector will generally be viewed as employees entitled to compensation except in very limited circumstances.
Whether an individual working in an internship or training program is considered an employee that should be paid minimum wage and overtime compensation under the FLSA depends on the facts and circumstances. When making this determination, the following criteria must be applied to each particular situation:
- The internship, even though it includes performing actual work, is similar to training which would be given in an educational environment;
- The internship experience is for the benefit of the intern;
- The intern works under close supervision of existing staff and does not displace regular employees;
- The employer derives no immediate advantage from the activities of the intern, and its operations may occasionally be impeded by the intern;
- The intern is not necessarily entitled to a job at the conclusion of the internship; and
- The employer and the intern understand that the intern is not entitled to wages for the time spent in the internship.
More... 4b02e3c8-9ccf-4d81-8c11-7786147a1b7c|0|.0
Tags: 2013, FLSA, Fair Labor Standards Act, Employment Liability, Employee Status and Job Descriptions, The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), Internships, Workplace Rights, wage & hour, Unpaid Internship
Categories: 2013, Human Resources, Risk Management
by Anita Byer, President - The Human Equation
on 2/19/2013 In a previous article we discussed what can happen when a condominium association improperly handles an accommodation request involving a service animal. Unfortunately, a recent federal case in Florida shows that some associations are still struggling with requests for service animals.
In this case, a veteran of the U.S. Air Force suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was told he could not keep his dog because it exceeded the association’s 25-pound limit. The unit owner sent a letter from his treating physician stating that the emotional support animal was prescribed to help the unit owner cope with his PTSD-related depression, stress and anxiety. The physician then provided two more letters describing the nature of the disability and the need for an emotional support animal in greater detail.
Nevertheless, the association requested more information from the unit owner and his physician. After several months without a response, the association formally demanded removal of the dog. After filing a complaint with the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Florida Commission on Human Relations, the unit owner sued the association under the federal and Florida Fair Housing Act (FHA) for denying him a reasonable accommodation.
More... by Martin Salcedo, Esq. - The Human Equation
on 1/29/2013 The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals recently became the first federal appellate court to consider a significant, though rarely publicized, provision of the Affordable Care Act—the reasonable break time requirement for nursing mothers under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
In Miller v. Roche Surety and Casualty, an employee sued her employer alleging a violation of her rights as a nursing mother under the FLSA. Under the FLSA, employers are required to provide reasonable break time for an employee to express breast milk for her nursing child. This requirement, which extends for 1 year after the child's birth, requires an employer to provide “a place, other than a bathroom, that is shielded from view and free from intrusion from coworkers and the public,” so that the employee may express breast milk.
More...
b1dfee16-fe40-4274-a0ed-6d55e4250af8|0|.0
Tags: 2013, Fair Labor Standards Act, FLSA, Human Resources, Workplace Rights, The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), Risk Management, Rules and Conduct, Reasonable Break Requirement, Nursing Mothers
Categories: 2013, Human Resources, Risk Management
by Martin Salcedo, Esq. - The Human Equation
on 1/8/2013 The Fair Labor Standards Act limits an employer’s ability to make salary deductions from employees who are exempt from the FLSA’s overtime compensation provisions. Exempt employees must generally receive their full salary for any week in which they perform any work, regardless of the number of days or hours worked. And, the FLSA generally does not allow employers to deduct from an exempt employee’s salary because of variations in the quality or quantity of work performed.
However, there are limited exceptions to the FLSA’s general rule against salary deductions for exempt employees. For example, salary deductions are allowed:
More... by Martin Salcedo, Esq. - The Human Equation
on 11/20/2012 An employer’s liability for sexual harassment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act depends on whether the harasser is a supervisor. If the alleged harasser is the victim’s co-employee, the employer may have various defenses to liability. However, if the harasser is a supervisor, Title VII’s strict liability standard may be triggered and the employer may be left defenseless.
So, who is considered a supervisor under Title VII?
More... 8a898bca-fca8-4062-ba80-73578b363d6b|0|.0
Tags: 2012, Business Strategy, Discrimination, EEOC, Employee Status and Job Descriptions, Employment Liability, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Fair Labor Standards Act, Human Resources, Laws and Regulations, Managers, Risk Management, Rules and Conduct, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Workplace Rights, Workplace Harassment and Discrimination, Sexual Harassment, Obama, Supreme Court, November, Vance v. Ball State University
Categories: 2012, Human Resources, Risk Management
by Martin Salcedo, Esq. - The Human Equation
on 10/24/2012 Effective January 1, 2013, Florida’s minimum wage will be $7.79 per hour. This represents an increase of 12 cents over the 2012 minimum wage of $7.67 per hour. The minimum wage for tipped employees will increase by the same amount to $4.77 per hour.
More...